After the texture assessment at the store and after the cut parts review at the cutting table, we need to put back the texture to its unique position, whether in roll or stack shape. This handle is as it were conceivable with dimensionally steady textures. In addition, here we are taking three steps (empty, assess, and reload). In the event that we combine texture assessment amid spreading and cut parts assessment amid sewing, at that point the third step of reloading, i.e. re-stacking the bundles after cut portion review can be dispensed with, hence empowering lesser dealing with materials and sparing time.

The number of surrenders in textures can too impact when choosing the proper option. If the texture quality is sweet and we know the chances of having an imperfection falling interior of the cut component is say less than 5%, at that point one may take after either alternative 3 or choice 4. Be that as it may, on the off chance that there are higher events of surrenders in a specific texture part, and the chances of having an imperfection falling interior a cut component is say more than 10%, then one may take after either choice 1 or choice 2. This is often due to the coordination of overseeing the spreading and sewing instead of as it was considering around the time spared amid wrapping up.

In spite of the fact that it could seem that review of each component time recently sewing by sewing administrators may increment the sewing cycle time significantly, be that as it may sewing of little parts may require none or insignificant additional time than sewing standard miniature esteem, as it were expansive portion sewing may require additional review time in addition to sewing standard time (typically due to a greater zone to be reviewed absent from sewing line).